Medistill
Get StartedConnect to ClaudeSign In

Health Systems & Hospitals

Quality benchmarking, competitive intelligence, and physician workforce analytics, across every US hospital

Peer hospital comparison, HCAHPS domain analysis, cost-to-charge benchmarking, and physician workforce planning, board-ready in one conversation. Replace six-figure consulting engagements with a from $199/month subscription.

7,000+hospitals in CMS database
9.4Mprovider records
50state medical boards
from $199/mo$100K+/yr

How it works

One question. Board-ready hospital analytics.

These are real reports generated from live CMS data. Ask Medistill to benchmark any hospital , it pulls the full CMS Hospital Compare profile in a single call, HCAHPS stars, excess readmission ratios (AMI, HF, PN, COPD, HIP_KNEE, CABG), HAI standardized infection ratios, PSI-90, Value-Based Purchasing Total Performance Score, MSPB vs national, plus cost reports and physician workforce.

Query

“Emory University Hospital Midtown is a ~500-bed teaching hospital in Atlanta. Find the 10 most similar hospitals nationally by profile, then compare us on overall quality rating, readmission rates, patient satisfaction, mortality, and hospital cost-to-charge ratio. Where are we winning and where are we falling behind?”

Emory Midtown Peer Benchmarking

CMS Hospital Compare · Medicare Cost Reports FY2022 · HCAHPS Apr 2024 – Mar 2025 · Source: Medistill

Overall CMS rating
2 of 5 stars
Mortality (vs national)
0/7
worse; 7 no different
Readmission flags
1 worse
1 better, 9 no different
Safety measures
2 better
6 no different, 0 worse
Overall patient rating
(H_HSP_RATING)

Peer Hospital Comparison

HospitalStateCMSMort.Readm.SafetyNurseDr.Med.OverallRecommend
Emory Univ. MidtownGA201223234
Allegheny GeneralPA201233234
NE Georgia Med. CenterGA201223234
Parkview Medical CenterCO201222222
Trinity Health OaklandMI201122233
Ascension St. Vincent’sFL201132134
CHI St. Joseph RegionalTX301232233
Mercy Hospital SouthMO301222132
Baton Rouge GeneralLA301234244
MercyOne Des MoinesIA200322122
Adventist Shady GroveMD200232233

Excess Readmission Ratios, Emory vs Peer Median (lower is better)

ConditionEmory ratioPeer medianStatus
AMI (heart attack)0.9640.986Better
CABG (bypass surgery)0.9741.027Better
COPD1.0300.979Lagging
Heart failure1.0830.971Lagging
Hip/knee replacementN/A1.093No data
Pneumonia1.0070.985Slightly above

HCAHPS Satisfaction, Emory Midtown Key Metrics (2024–25)

DomainEmory “Always” %Starvs Baton Rouge General (best peer)
Nurse communication74%Peer has ★★★
Doctor communication79%At par
Medication communication52%Peer has ★★★
Discharge information83%Peer has ★★★★
Room cleanliness65%Below avg urban hospital
Overall hospital ratingTied w/ most peers
Would recommendTop of peer group

Financial Profile, FY2022 Cost Report

HospitalNet patient revenueBedsRevenue/bedOperating income/(loss)
Emory Univ. Midtown$4.21B548$7.69M($210M)
Allegheny General$3.70B528$7.00M($1M)
NE Georgia Med. Center$6.77B645$10.49M$68M
Parkview Medical$3.07B253$12.14M$21M
Trinity Health Oakland$1.56B333$4.69M($35M)
Ascension St. Vincent’s$3.03B362$8.37M($22M)
CHI St. Joseph Regional$2.57B298$8.63M($154M)
Mercy Hospital South$2.04B720$2.83M($7M)
Baton Rouge General$1.23B251$4.89M($30M)
MercyOne Des Moines$3.23B556$5.81M($36M)
Adventist Shady Grove$531M381$1.39M($17M)

Where Emory Midtown is winning vs. falling behind

Strengths
  • Patient likelihood to recommend: ★★★★, top of the peer group, tied only with Ascension, NE Georgia, and Baton Rouge
  • AMI & CABG readmissions well below peer median (0.964 and 0.974 ERR)
  • 2 safety measures rated “better than national”, matches or beats most peers
  • Zero mortality measures flagged as worse, same as every peer hospital
  • Doctor communication at 3 stars / 79% “always”, on par with top peers
  • Revenue per bed ($7.69M) above the peer median (~$6.4M)
Areas lagging
  • Overall CMS rating is 2 stars, 3 peers (CHI St. Joseph, Mercy South, Baton Rouge General) have already reached 3 stars
  • Heart failure readmissions: ERR 1.083, worst in the peer group (peer median 0.971)
  • COPD readmissions: ERR 1.030, above peer median (0.979)
  • Nurse communication: only ★★, multiple peers score ★★★
  • Medication communication: 52% “always”, one of the lowest; 37% of patients say staff “sometimes or never” discussed side effects
  • Operating loss of $210M, largest deficit in the peer set by a wide margin
  • Room cleanliness: 65% “always” clean, below urban teaching hospital norms

Analysis

The short summary: You're holding your own on clinical safety and earning patient loyalty, but you're leaking on heart failure, nurse communication, and, notably, your operating margin.

Where Emory Midtown is winning: On mortality, Emory has zero measures rated worse than national average across all 7 tracked conditions. More distinctively, Emory has 2 safety measures rated “better than national,” matching the median peer performance. On readmissions, AMI (ERR 0.964) and CABG (ERR 0.974) are both below the peer group median. And despite the 2-star overall rating, patient likelihood to recommend scores a 4-star rating, tied for the top of the peer group alongside Ascension St. Vincent's, NE Georgia Medical Center, and Baton Rouge General.

Where Emory is falling behind: The three peers that have broken into 3-star territory, CHI St. Joseph (TX), Mercy Hospital South (MO), and Baton Rouge General (LA), are doing it primarily through patient experience and readmission control. The biggest gap for Emory is heart failure readmissions: an excess readmission ratio of 1.083 vs. a peer median of 0.971, the worst in the cohort. Nurse communication scores 2 stars (74% “always”), and medication communication is particularly weak at 52% “always,” with 37% of patients reporting staff “sometimes or never” discussed medication side effects.

On the financial side, the $210M operating loss in FY2022 is the largest deficit in the peer set by a substantial margin. Revenue per bed ($7.69M) is above median, so this is a cost structure issue, not a volume one.

The clearest path to 3 stars: Target heart failure readmissions + nurse communication. Those two levers have the highest weight in CMS's methodology and represent the sharpest gap vs. peers who've already moved up.

Follow-up query

“For the peer hospitals that outperform us on patient satisfaction, what do their HCAHPS domain scores look like? Is it communication, responsiveness, cleanliness, or pain management where they're ahead?”

HCAHPS Domain Comparison

HCAHPS data: Apr 2024 – Mar 2025 · All values are % responding “Always” or “Yes” · Source: Medistill

Emory Midtown (you) Baton Rouge General ★★★★ Allegheny General (★★★★ recommend) Ascension St. Vincent's (★★★★ recommend)
Values = % patients responding “Always” (or “Yes” for binary items). Bars scaled to 100%.
Nurse communication (COMP-1)
Emory lagging
EmoryBaton RougeAlleghenyAscension SV
Always communicated well
-4pp vs BR
74%78%78%76%
Always treated with respect
-6pp vs BR
79%85%85%83%
Always listened carefully
-5pp vs BR
73%78%78%76%
Always explained clearly
-5pp vs BR
72%77%75%73%
Doctor communication (COMP-2)
Mixed, Emory strong on respect
EmoryBaton RougeAlleghenyAscension SV
Always communicated well
+1pp vs BR
78%77%82%77%
Always treated with respect
On par
85%85%85%85%
Always listened carefully
-3pp vs BR
75%78%82%77%
Always explained clearly
+1pp vs Allegheny
76%75%75%74%
Medication communication (COMP-5)
Critical gap, worst sub-score
EmoryBaton RougeAlleghenyAscension SV
Staff always explained what meds were for
-8pp vs BR
67%75%74%74%
Staff always discussed side effects
-10pp vs BR
36%46%43%42%
Discharge information (COMP-6)
Emory lagging behind top peers
EmoryBaton RougeAlleghenyAscension SV
Given recovery instructions
-5pp vs Allegheny
84%89%89%86%
Discussed need for help after discharge
-6pp vs Allegheny
82%88%88%86%
Given written symptom watch list
-6pp vs Allegheny
84%90%90%88%
Physical environment, cleanliness & quietness
Allegheny notably better on cleanliness
EmoryBaton RougeAlleghenyAscension SV
Room always clean
-8pp vs Allegheny
65%64%73%65%
Area always quiet at night
Emory tied/ahead of 2 peers
64%60%50%60%
Key Takeaways
Where peers are genuinely ahead
Medication side-effects communication is the sharpest gap, Emory at 36% “always” vs. 43–46% for all three peers. This single item likely pulls down the whole COMP-5 domain score. Nurse listening and explaining (72–70%) are each 4–5pp below Baton Rouge and Allegheny. Discharge completeness (symptom watch list, post-discharge help discussion) trails Baton Rouge and Allegheny by 4–6pp across all three sub-items.
Where Emory holds its own
Doctor communication scores (79% overall, 85% respect, 78% listening) are on par with Allegheny and Ascension, only Baton Rouge beats Emory here. Quietness at night (64%) is actually better than Allegheny (50%) and Ascension (60%). Room cleanliness is tied with Ascension (both 65%), only Allegheny is notably better at 73%. These are real defensive strengths, especially nighttime environment.
What's driving the star gap
The CMS satisfaction composite weighting heavily favors nurse communication and medication communication. Even a 4–5pp gap in nurse listening/explaining translates to a full star tier difference in the CMS model. Baton Rouge General's 4-star rating is built almost entirely on consistently better nurse behaviors and a dramatically stronger medication side-effects score, not on cleanliness or quietness.
Highest-leverage intervention
Medication side-effects communication (36% 46% target) is the single biggest addressable gap. This is a bedside behavior change, brief standardized “here's what this medication does and its main side effects” scripting at administration time. It's operationally tractable and directly moves the COMP-5 linear score, which is one of CMS's most weighted satisfaction inputs.

Medication communication is the sharpest single gap. Emory's score of 36% “always discussed side effects” is 10 percentage points below Baton Rouge General (46%) and 7pp below Allegheny (43%). This is the worst-performing sub-item across all four hospitals, and it pulls down the entire COMP-5 domain. A targeted improvement from 36% to the low-to-mid 40s would move Emory from the bottom of the pack to the middle on this domain.

Nurse communication is consistently 4–6pp below the top peers on every sub-item. Not by a lot on any single item, but the gap is systematic across listening, explaining, and respecting, which tells you this is a workflow and culture pattern, not a random variation. Baton Rouge General's nurses score higher on every single nurse sub-item.

Discharge completeness is a consistent 4–6pp gap vs. Baton Rouge and Allegheny. Especially the written symptom watch list (84% vs. 90%) and post-discharge help discussion (82% vs. 88%). These are structural process items: they happen or they don't, which means they're highly fixable with protocol changes rather than behavior change.

The good news: cleanliness and quietness are not the problem. Emory at 64% quiet-at-night actually beats Allegheny (50%) and Ascension (60%). Cleanliness is tied with Ascension at 65%, only Allegheny's 73% stands out.

The practical implication: Baton Rouge's 4-star rating is not the product of a better physical environment or superior physician communication. It's built on nurses being slightly but consistently more communicative and on staff doing a better job explaining medications. Those are behaviors that respond to standardized scripting, rounding protocols, and targeted coaching, which makes this an achievable improvement target.

Follow-up query

“Now show me the physician workforce around our hospital, how many specialists by type within our county, their average Medicare volume, and whether any have state board discipline or compliance flags.”

Atlanta Physician Workforce & Compliance

CMS Medicare Utilization Provider, 2022 · OIG LEIE · GA Composite Medical Board · Source: Medistill

Specialist categories
24
physician specialties
Total specialists (Medicare)
3,416
billing in Atlanta/Fulton, 2022
OIG-excluded physicians
20+
clinical specialties, GA, active
GA board discipline (active)
27
probation, suspended, or revoked
Specialty PhysiciansVolumeAvg beneficiariesAvg Medicare paidTotal paid ($M)
Internal Medicine554
215$59K32.7
Emergency Medicine329
255$40K13.1
Anesthesiology290
188$25K7.33
Diagnostic Radiology279
1,502$81K22.63
Hospitalist150
186$40K5.96
General Surgery144
113$47K6.7
Neurology122
190$63K7.66
Cardiology117
570$74K8.65
Ophthalmology108
543$471K50.84
Psychiatry100
71$26K2.6
Pathology96
588$58K5.59
Orthopedic Surgery94
215$101K9.51
Gastroenterology85
293$89K7.59
Nephrology80
238$102K8.19
Infectious Disease78
89$37K2.85
Dermatology76
507$179K13.62
Otolaryngology74
197$66K4.9
Pulmonary Disease54
163$42K2.26
Urology54
300$90K4.87
Hematology-Oncology49
219$284K13.92
Endocrinology43
281$77K3.31
Radiation Oncology40
128$231K9.23
Interventional Cardiology39
590$123K4.79
Neurosurgery39
129$80K3.1
Source: CMS Medicare Utilization Provider, 2022. City = Atlanta + Atlanta-Fulton, GA. Volume bar scaled to max avg services in cohort (Hematology-Oncology, 13,349 avg services). “Avg Medicare paid” = average annual Medicare payment per physician in this specialty.

Workforce depth: The Atlanta/Fulton physician workforce is deep on primary drivers for a hospital like Emory Midtown. Internal medicine leads at 554 physicians billing Medicare, followed by emergency medicine (329) and anesthesiology (290). The two most financially intensive specialties per physician are ophthalmology ($470K average Medicare payment) and hematology-oncology ($284K). Interventional cardiology (39 physicians) and neurosurgery (39) are the thinnest specialist pools relative to the care complexity they support, worth monitoring for recruitment and coverage risk.

OIG exclusions: There are 16+ currently active OIG exclusions for clinical physicians in GA with no reinstatement date. The most recent include a pain management physician (Talmadge, excluded June 2025 under 1128a1, Medicare fraud conviction), a psychiatrist (Lundgren, June 2025, license revocation), and a nephrologist (Okonkwo, January 2025). Federal regulations require hospitals to check LEIE before initial privileging and periodically thereafter.

Georgia Medical Board discipline: The GCMB currently shows 9 physicians on active probation (licensed but practicing under formal conditions), 9 suspended, and 9 revoked, all with discipline flags. The probation cohort is the most operationally relevant: these physicians hold valid Georgia licenses and may be in active practice or seeking privileges.

The practical credentialing implication: The exclusion list and board discipline list should be cross-referenced against Emory Midtown's current medical staff roster and any community physicians with active referring relationships or hospital-based privileges. Billing for services rendered by or arranged through an excluded provider is a False Claims Act exposure, regardless of whether the hospital knew.

What you can ask

Questions that used to take weeks, answered in a conversation

Each question runs against real data. Follow-ups build on previous results , Medistill remembers context across the entire conversation.

Peer hospital benchmarking

1

Find 10 hospitals most similar to ours nationally, then compare on quality ratings, readmission rates, HCAHPS satisfaction, mortality, and cost-to-charge ratios. Where are we winning and falling behind?

Joins CMS Hospital Compare, HCAHPS, Cost Reports, and readmissions data into a single peer analysis no dashboard or consultant can replicate this fast.

2

For the peers outperforming us on patient satisfaction, break down their HCAHPS domain scores, nurse communication, medication communication, discharge info. Where exactly is the gap?

Drill into the specific HCAHPS sub-items driving the star gap, identifies the highest-leverage improvement targets.

3

What would it take for us to move from 2 to 3 CMS stars? Which specific measures are dragging us down the most?

Maps the CMS methodology to your specific data to show which measures have the highest weight and largest gap.

Without Medistill

Hire a consulting firm for $150K+ and wait 3 months. Or manually pull CMS data for each peer, build comparison spreadsheets, and hope the data is current.

Heart failure readmission root cause

1

Our heart failure readmission rate is 1.083, worst in our peer group. Pull every heart failure discharge from our cost report data, compare post-discharge follow-up patterns with the 3 peers who have the best HF readmission ratios. What are they doing differently?

Connects readmission data to operational patterns across peer hospitals, identifies what top performers do differently that your team can implement.

2

For the hospitals with the lowest HF readmission ratios, what does their 30-day post-discharge care look like? Telehealth visits, home health referrals, cardiology follow-up rates?

Surfaces the specific operational patterns that drive better outcomes, actionable for your care management team.

Without Medistill

Months of chart review, data requests to peer hospitals (who won’t share), and guesswork about what drives the gap.

Physician workforce & compliance screening

1

Show the physician workforce in our county by specialty, count, average Medicare volume, and total Medicare payments. Then flag any with OIG exclusions, SAM.gov debarments, or state medical board discipline.

Combines Medicare utilization, OIG LEIE, SAM.gov, and state board data in one query, surfaces compliance risks that would take days of manual cross-referencing.

2

For the 9 physicians on active probation, cross-reference their license numbers against our current credentialing roster. Are any of them privileged at our facility?

Directly connects state board discipline data to your credentialing workflow, surfaces active compliance exposure.

3

Which specialist categories have the thinnest coverage in our county? If we lose one interventional cardiologist or neurosurgeon, what’s the impact on our call coverage?

Quantifies workforce vulnerability by specialty, critical for recruitment planning and call coverage risk.

Without Medistill

Manual OIG LEIE checks one-by-one, separate state board lookups, no way to connect workforce supply to compliance risk in a single view.

Cost-to-charge benchmarking

1

Pull our Medicare cost report alongside our 10 closest peer hospitals. Compare operating margins, revenue per bed, cost-to-charge ratios, and payer mix. Where are we spending more than peers for similar outcomes?

Medicare Cost Reports are public but notoriously hard to analyze. Medistill normalizes and compares them automatically across your peer set.

2

For the 3 peers with positive operating margins, what’s their payer mix vs ours? Is the margin difference driven by commercial volume or cost control?

Separates revenue-side from cost-side drivers of margin differences, critical for strategic planning.

Without Medistill

Download raw cost reports from CMS, spend weeks normalizing across different fiscal years and reporting formats, or pay $80K+ for a benchmarking subscription.

HCAHPS improvement targeting

1

We need to move our nurse communication score from 2 stars to 3 stars. Find every hospital nationally that made this exact improvement in the last 2 years, what did their other HCAHPS scores look like before and after? Did the improvement come from one sub-item or across the board?

Identifies real-world improvement examples instead of theoretical benchmarks, shows what hospitals like yours actually did to move the needle.

2

For the hospitals that improved nurse communication by ≥1 star, did their readmission rates also improve? Is there a correlation between HCAHPS improvement and clinical outcomes?

Tests whether HCAHPS improvement translates to clinical outcomes, builds the ROI case for patient experience investment.

Without Medistill

No existing tool tracks HCAHPS score changes over time at the domain level. Would require downloading multiple years of HCAHPS data and building custom trend analysis.

Predictive risk intelligence

Know which hospitals are heading toward distress

Our predictive model scores every US acute care and critical access hospital on financial distress risk , trained on 7 years of Medicare cost reports, quality metrics, and community data. Walk-forward validated: train on year N, predict distress in year N+1.

0
Grade DHigh risk

Each hospital gets a 0–100 risk score with a letter grade and plain-language explanations. High scores mean the model sees patterns, margin decline, volume erosion, rising expenses , that historically precede financial distress within 12 months.

6,170

Hospitals scored

55

Risk features

7 years

Cost report history

12 mo

Forward prediction

Walk-Forward Temporal Backtest

Model trained on cost reports through year N, predicts which hospitals enter financial distress in year N+1.

Prediction YearHospitals TestedDistress RateTraining Data
20216,23215.0%2018–2019
20226,20022.9%2018–2020
20236,15219.8%2018–2021
20245,86016.3%2018–2022

What this means: Roughly 1 in 5 US hospitals show signs of financial distress each year. The model identifies high-risk hospitals 12 months before distress becomes public , giving health plans, investors, and supply chain teams early warning to act.

What the model looks at, 55 features across 4 categories

Cost Report Financials

29 features

Operating margin, margin trend, revenue per discharge, expense growth, bed occupancy

Quality & Safety

15 features

Star rating, HCAHPS scores, readmission rates, mortality, patient safety indicators

Community Context

8 features

County median income, population, unemployment rate, rural/urban classification

Interaction Effects

3 features

Margin × occupancy, volume × expense trends, quality × financial stress

Top risk drivers, ranked by predictive importance

Total discharges
Volume decline signals demand erosion
Operating margin
Core profitability measure
Margin trend
Year-over-year margin trajectory
HCAHPS star rating
Patient satisfaction predicts volume
Revenue per discharge
Payer mix and reimbursement strength

Why switch

Medistill vs. traditional hospital analytics

Consulting firms / manual CMS
Medistill hospital analytics, from $199 per month

Peer hospital matching

Manual selection, subjective

AI-powered similarity search across 7K+ hospitals

HCAHPS domain analysis

Download raw data, build spreadsheets

Ask a question, get domain-by-domain comparison

Readmission benchmarking

Aggregate reports only

Condition-level ERR comparison with peer context

Cost report analysis

Weeks of normalization

Instant peer comparison, normalized

Physician workforce

County health department reports

Real-time Medicare utilization + compliance flags

Compliance screening

Manual OIG + state board checks

130+ databases, instant, with risk scoring

Joint Commission accreditation

Call QualityCheck.org, one hospital at a time

Lookup by name or CCN against 15,754 JC-accredited orgs, accreditation-type detail

Dashboards

Pre-built templates, IT tickets

Ask for a dashboard, generated instantly

Reports

Manual exports, copy-paste

"Turn this into a report", formatted, downloadable

Modifications

New query, start over

"Filter to cardiac surgery only", refine by asking

Scheduled monitoring

Not available or enterprise add-on

Schedule any query daily/weekly via Claude

Price

$100K–$300K/yr consulting + data subscriptions

From $199/mo

Predictive risk scoring

Not available

AI model trained on 7 years of cost reports, 12-month forward prediction

Data coverage

The complete hospital analytics stack, in one platform

Benchmark Against Peers

  • Compare star ratings, mortality, and readmissions across 7,000+ hospitals
  • HCAHPS domain-by-domain patient experience analysis
  • Infection rates, safety measures, and complication tracking

Track Financial Performance

  • 7-year cost report trends with operating margin trajectory
  • Cost-to-charge ratios and payer mix analysis
  • Predictive risk scoring for financial distress

Map Your Workforce

  • See every provider at your hospital by specialty
  • Geographic search for recruitment targets by radius
  • Identify industry payment exposure and research activity

Screen for Compliance Risk

  • 130-source instant screening for every credentialed provider
  • OIG, SAM.gov, state boards, FDA, NPDB malpractice
  • Risk score (0–100) and letter grade per provider

Board-ready analytics, one conversation away

7,000+ hospitals, 9.4M providers, and complete quality benchmarking , all queryable through AI at from $199/month.