Medistill
Get StartedConnect to ClaudeSign In

Pharmaceutical & Life Sciences

Drug safety, prescribing intelligence, and KOL identification, across 25M+ adverse event reports

Complete drug lifecycle analytics from clinical trials to FDA approval to prescribing patterns to adverse events to enforcement recalls. Replace six-figure data contracts with a from $199/month subscription.

25M+adverse event reports
577Kclinical trials
1.12Mformulary drug-plan mappings
9.3MMedicaid drug utilization rows
156Kdrug labels (DailyMed)
from $199/mo$100K+/yr

How it works

One question. Complete drug safety comparison.

This is a real report generated from live adverse-event data. Ask Medistill to compare any drugs , it pulls adverse events, death reports, serious outcomes, and key safety signals across the entire class.

Query

“Compare the complete adverse event profiles of the top 5 GLP-1 drugs , semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and exenatide. Show total reports, serious outcome rates, top 10 reactions for each, death counts, and which drug has the cleanest safety profile.”

GLP-1 Adverse Event Profile Comparison

FDA adverse-event database · All-time reports · Primary suspect role unless noted · Source: Medistill

Total adverse-event reports, all roles

Tirzepatide
130,176
Highest volume
Dulaglutide
91,872
2nd highest
Semaglutide
88,834
3rd highest
Exenatide
39,952
Oldest in class
Liraglutide
39,413
Lowest volume

Safety profile scorecard (lower = better)

Semaglutide

Deaths per 1k reports

6.3

Serious rate %

6.4%

Tirzepatide

Deaths per 1k reports

3.6

Serious rate %

2.4%

lowest rates

Liraglutide

Deaths per 1k reports

13.6

Serious rate %

12.3%

Dulaglutide

Deaths per 1k reports

8.8

Serious rate %

5.2%

Exenatide

Deaths per 1k reports

12.8

Serious rate %

5.7%

Key safety signals, per-drug breakdown

SignalSemaglutideTirzepatideLiraglutideDulaglutideExenatide
Pancreatitis (all)2,7083,6172,4842,2691,004
Acute kidney injury1,2721,0991,145911690
Ileus1,5211,32810651920
Suicidal ideation86773120413079
Diabetic ketoacidosis647374583530191
Pulmonary embolism32442038211594
Thyroid cancer145138115116157
Cardiac arrest2581491669839
Acute MI12546916028
Death reports558465535810511

Per-drug summary cards

Semaglutide

Total reports88,834
Death reports558
Serious signals5,696
Pancreatitis2,708
Suicidal ideation867
Deaths/1k6.3

Tirzepatide

Total reports130,176
Death reports465
Serious signals3,075
Pancreatitis3,617
Suicidal ideation731
Deaths/1k3.6

Liraglutide

Total reports39,413
Death reports535
Serious signals4,834
Pancreatitis2,484
Suicidal ideation204
Deaths/1k13.6

Dulaglutide

Total reports91,872
Death reports810
Serious signals4,762
Pancreatitis2,269
Suicidal ideation130
Deaths/1k8.8

Exenatide

Total reports39,952
Death reports511
Serious signals2,295
Pancreatitis1,004
Suicidal ideation79
Deaths/1k12.8

Analysis

Total report volumes, tirzepatide dominates with 130,176 reports despite being the newest drug, largely because it was launched during the GLP-1 mass-market explosion. Liraglutide and exenatide are the smallest (both ~39k), reflecting their declining use.

Death reports, dulaglutide has the most at 810, followed by semaglutide (558), liraglutide (535), exenatide (511), and tirzepatide (465). Adjusted for total reports, tirzepatide and exenatide actually have the lowest death-per-1k-report rates.

Notable signals by drug:

  • Semaglutide: Ileus (1,521) and suicidal ideation (867) stand out, the FDA has added a label update on the ileus risk.
  • Tirzepatide: Highest pancreatitis count (3,617) and highest pulmonary embolism reports (420), despite being the newest.
  • Liraglutide: Stands out on pulmonary embolism (382) relative to its report volume.
  • Dulaglutide: Highest raw death count (810); also notable for ileus and acute kidney injury.
  • Exenatide: Dominated by device-related events (Byetta pen), plus the strongest pancreatitis signal historically for the class.

Cleanest safety profile? On a rates-adjusted basis, tirzepatide and exenatide tie for the lowest deaths-per-1,000-reports. But adverse-event reporting is not a denominator-adjusted incidence database, higher reports reflect higher prescribing, not necessarily higher risk per patient.

Follow-up query

“For semaglutide specifically, show me the quarterly trend of psychiatric adverse events , depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation. Is there a real signal or is it reporting noise?”

Semaglutide, Psychiatric Adverse Event Trend Analysis

Adverse-event reporting · 2018Q1–2025Q4 · 32 quarters · Comparator: liraglutide · Source: Medistill

Total psychiatric reports
6,880
All-time
Peak quarter
1,083
2025Q3
Suicidal ideation reports
1,055
Ideation + attempts
Rate trend
Rising ↑
~6–10% of reports

Key inflection points

2021Q3, Wegovy approval
Psychiatric reports jump 75% (55 → 96/quarter). Broader patient population enters reporting pipeline.
2023Q3, FDA/EMA review
Suicidal ideation reports spike 8× (14 → 116 in one quarter). Stimulated reporting effect from regulatory attention.
2024–2025, Sustained elevation
Rate stabilizes at 6–10% of total reports. Volume-driven, proportional to prescribing growth, not worsening signal.

Signal vs. noise assessment

Verdict
The psychiatric signal is real but proportional to volume growth. Depression and anxiety rates track closely with prescribing expansion, not an accelerating safety concern. The 2023Q3 suicidal ideation spike is a textbook stimulated reporting artifact from the FDA/EMA review announcement. Rates have since normalized. Semaglutide's psychiatric profile is comparable to liraglutide when volume-adjusted.
Key finding: The congressional question about GLP-1 and suicidal ideation can be answered with data: the spike was event-driven (regulatory review announcement), not drug-driven. Post-spike rates returned to baseline proportional levels.

Follow-up query

“Now show me the top 50 semaglutide prescribers by plan volume, their specialties, states, and how much they receive from Novo Nordisk in industry payments. Are the highest-volume prescribers also the ones getting the most industry money?”

Top 50 Semaglutide Prescribers, plan-level Volume vs. Novo Nordisk Payments

Plan claims (2022) · industry payments (all years) · Source: Medistill

Top 50 total claims
42,584
2022
plan drug spend
$56.5M
Top 50 combined
Received Novo Nordisk payments
76%
38 of 50
Top speaker payment
$488K
Single prescriber

Specialty breakdown

SpecialtyCountShare
Endocrinology3570%
Internal Medicine510%
Nurse Practitioner48%
Cardiology12%
Nephrology12%
Preventive Medicine12%
Family Practice12%
Physician Assistant12%
Psychiatry12%

Top 15 prescribers by plan volume

RankNameSpecialtyStatePlan ClaimsDrug SpendNovo PaymentsPayment Type
1Angueira-Serrano EEndocrinologyFL2,266$2.4M$130,171Speaker+Consult
2Urusova IEndocrinologyCA1,852$1.8M$2,446Meals/Ed
3Perkelvald AEndocrinologyNY1,624$1.7M$196,477Speaker
4Cabaccan AEndocrinologyTX1,393$1.3M$488,063Speaker
5Pittman KInt. MedicineSC1,373$1.5M$488,096Speaker
6Doria MEndocrinologyNJ1,227$1.3M$46,523Speaker
7Mesquita FEndocrinologyTX1,165$1.0M$8,779Meals/Ed
8Velez JEndocrinologyFL1,107$1.1M$67,422Speaker
9Razzaque SEndocrinologyTX1,074$950K$110,553Speaker
10Wang GEndocrinologyNJ1,044$1.1M$8,437Meals/Ed
11Stein EEndocrinologyNY1,031$1.1M$152,729Speaker
12Cohen AEndocrinologyFL1,011$1.0M$34,500Speaker
13Shah AEndocrinologyIL987$1.0M$139,820Speaker
14Ametov AEndocrinologyNY960$978K$112,854Speaker
15Gonzalez-Campoy MEndocrinologyMN940$1.1M$232,429Speaker

Correlation analysis

Verdict: Moderate correlation (r ≈ 0.52)
Moderate positive correlation between Novo Nordisk payments and plan-level claim volume. Not tight, several high-volume prescribers received only meal/education payments ($1–4K). Top-paid speakers consistently cluster in the top half of prescribers by volume. The #1 prescriber by volume received $130K; the #2 received only $2.4K. Active speaker bureau membership, not total payments, appears to be the stronger predictor of prescribing volume.
Key finding: 70% of top semaglutide prescribers are endocrinologists. 76% receive some payment from Novo Nordisk, but the correlation between payment amount and prescribing volume is moderate, volume is driven more by specialty and practice setting than industry money.

What you can ask

Questions that used to take weeks, answered in a conversation

Each question runs against real data. Follow-ups build on previous results , Medistill remembers context across the entire conversation.

GLP-1 adverse event head-to-head

1

Compare the complete adverse event profiles of the top 5 GLP-1 drugs, semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and exenatide. Total reports, death rate, hospitalization rate, top 10 reactions each, and demographic breakdown.

One query across 25M+ adverse-event reports, pulls total volumes, death rates, serious outcomes, and per-drug signal breakdowns for the entire GLP-1 class.

2

Show me the quarterly trend of semaglutide adverse events over the last 3 years. Are reports accelerating or stabilizing?

Reveals whether the safety signal is growing with adoption or plateauing, critical for regulatory and commercial planning.

3

For semaglutide specifically, what percentage of death outcomes involve patients over 65? Break down by sex.

Demographic drill-down surfaces age/sex patterns that aggregate data masks, important for label updates and risk communication.

Without Medistill

Manually search adverse-event reports for each drug. No built-in comparison, no demographic breakdowns, no trend analysis. Takes days of analyst time.

KOL identification and conflict mapping

1

Build me a KOL ranking for oncology. Find the top 50 oncologists by combined Medicare patient volume + PubMed publication count + industry payments + active clinical trial PI roles. Who has the highest combined influence?

Joins four datasets in one query, Medicare utilization, PubMed, industry payments, and clinical trials, to build a multi-dimensional KOL ranking no single tool provides.

2

For the top 10, show which pharma companies are paying them, what the payments are for, and which drugs they prescribe the most.

Reveals the commercial relationship map, who’s paying your KOLs, for what, and whether their prescribing aligns.

3

Are any of these KOLs running trials for a competitor while receiving payments from us? Show the potential conflicts.

Surfaces conflict-of-interest patterns that would take weeks of manual cross-referencing across clinical-trial registry and industry payments.

Without Medistill

Requires separate subscriptions to Veeva ($200K+/yr), IQVIA, industry-payment search, PubMed, and clinical-trial registry, plus manual cross-referencing in Excel.

Drug shortage impact analysis

1

Three of our products just hit the FDA drug shortage list. For each, pull the adverse-event trend before and during the shortage. Are patients switching to alternatives and experiencing more adverse events?

Connects FDA shortage data to adverse-events in real time, shows whether shortages are causing patient harm through forced switching.

2

For each shortage drug, find similar drugs by prescribing pattern. Show the safety profile of each potential substitute, which alternatives have the cleanest adverse-event record?

Turns a reactive shortage response into a proactive substitution recommendation backed by real safety data.

Without Medistill

Check FDA shortage list manually. Separately search adverse-event reports for each drug. No way to automatically connect shortages to adverse event trends.

Psychiatric safety signal investigation

1

Congress is asking about GLP-1 drugs and suicidal ideation. Pull every adverse-event report mentioning any GLP-1 drug with psychiatric adverse events, depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, self-injury. Show by drug, by quarter, and whether reported by physician or consumer.

Structured pharmacovigilance query across the entire GLP-1 class with reporter-type breakdown, the analysis regulators and media are already asking for.

2

How does this compare to the psychiatric adverse event rate for other diabetes drugs, metformin, insulin glargine, empagliflozin? Is GLP-1 actually worse or is it proportional to prescribing volume?

Context matters, compares GLP-1 psychiatric signals against baseline diabetes drugs to determine if the signal is class-specific or volume-driven.

3

Pull the DailyMed label for semaglutide, does the current label include any psychiatric warnings or boxed warnings?

Immediately checks whether the finding is already reflected in the label, critical for regulatory response and media inquiries.

Without Medistill

Weeks of manual adverse-event analysis. No cross-class comparison. No way to pull current drug labels in the same workflow.

Biosimilar launch targeting

1

Our biosimilar is launching next quarter to compete with Humira. Show me the top 100 adalimumab prescribers by plan volume, their specialty, state, what percentage is already biosimilar vs branded, and how much they receive from AbbVie in industry payments. Who are the most likely early switchers?

Joins prescribing data with industry payments to identify prescribers already switching to biosimilars and those with low AbbVie financial ties, your conversion targets.

2

For the prescribers who are already >50% biosimilar, find 20 similar providers by utilization profile who are still on branded Humira. These are our conversion targets.

Uses prescribing pattern similarity to find look-alike targets, providers with the same profile who haven’t switched yet.

Without Medistill

Requires IQVIA or Symphony claims data ($100K+/yr) for prescribing volumes. Industry-payment data is a separate manual search. No way to identify similar providers.

Formulary positioning analysis

1

For the GLP-1 class, semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutide, show me which plans cover each one, what tier they’re on, and whether prior authorization or step therapy is required. How does our formulary positioning compare to competitors?

1.12M drug-plan-tier mappings with PA and step therapy flags. See exactly where your drug sits on every plan and identify formulary gaps vs competitors.

2

For plans that don’t cover tirzepatide at all, what’s their enrollment? How many beneficiaries are locked out of the newest GLP-1?

Quantifies the patient access gap, enrollment data shows how many lives are affected by formulary exclusions.

3

Map every SGLT2 inhibitor in DailyMed, brand names, RxCUI codes, pharmacologic class. Which ones share the same mechanism and which have unique labeling?

DailyMed drug class mapping connects RxNorm codes to pharmacologic classifications, instantly shows the competitive landscape by mechanism of action.

Without Medistill

Formulary data is scattered across CMS quarterly releases. No way to query tier status, PA requirements, and enrollment in one place. Drug class mapping requires manual NLM searches.

Why switch

Medistill vs. enterprise pharma data

IQVIA / Veeva / others
Medistill pharma market access intelligence, from $199 per month

Adverse-event database

Subset or manual FDA search

25M+ reports, full history, all outcomes

Clinical trials

clinical-trial registry manual

577K trials, searchable by drug/condition/PI/sponsor, drug×condition intersection filter returns only trials with BOTH

prescribing + formulary coverage

$100K+/yr or limited to prescribing only

All prescribers + 1.12M drug-plan-tier mappings with PA/step therapy flags

Drug labels (DailyMed)

Manual DailyMed search

156K labels, 465K RxNorm codes, 93K pharmacologic class mappings

Industry payments (pharma $)

Separate tool

All payments, all years, joined to NPI and prescribing data

Medicaid drug utilization

Not available

9.3M rows across 50 states, Medicaid drug spend and utilization by drug, state, year

Drug pricing (drug acquisition cost, ASP)

Separate subscription

drug acquisition costs (1.6M rows) + ASP current + historical

Geographic prescriber targeting

Not available

Find prescribers within X miles by specialty, with facility affiliations

KOL identification

$200K+/yr (Veeva, IQVIA)

Medicare volume + PubMed + payments + trials + facility affiliations

Drug shortages

Not available

Real-time FDA shortage list

Compliance screening

Not available

130+ federal + state sources, FDA debarment, CLIIL, warning letters included

Any language

English only

Ask and receive answers in any language

Price

$100K–$500K/yr (IQVIA, Veeva, Komodo)

From $199/mo

Data coverage

The complete drug lifecycle, in one platform

Drug Safety & Pharmacovigilance

  • Adverse-event reports (25M+)
  • VAERS (vaccine adverse events)
  • FDA drug recalls & enforcement
  • FDA warning letters
  • Drug shortage alerts

Clinical Trials & Evidence

  • clinical-trial registry (575K trials)
  • WHO ICTRP (international trials)
  • PubMed / MEDLINE (40M+ citations)
  • bioRxiv / medRxiv preprints

Prescribing & Market Intelligence

  • prescribing data (all drugs, all providers)
  • plan formulary coverage (1.12M drug-plan-tier mappings, PA/step therapy)
  • Medicaid drug utilization (9.3M rows, 50 states)
  • Medicare utilization (9.4M providers)
  • industry payments (pharma-to-physician $)
  • Drug pricing (drug acquisition costs 1.6M rows, ASP, plan drug spend)
  • Geographic prescriber targeting (find by specialty + radius)

Regulatory & Approvals

  • FDA drug approvals (NDAs, BLAs)
  • FDA device approvals (510(k), PMA)
  • EMA EPAR (EU approvals)
  • DailyMed (156K labels, 465K RxNorm codes, 93K drug classes)
  • National Drug Codes (NDC)
  • Compliance screening (130+ sources, FDA debarment, CLIIL, warning letters)

Replace six-figure data contracts

25M+ adverse event reports, 577K clinical trials, 1.12M formulary mappings, 9.3M Medicaid utilization rows, 156K drug labels , all queryable through AI at from $199/month. In any language.